AEROSMITH Guitarist 'Can't Imagine' What MICHAEL JACKSON's Life Was Like
- July 1, 2009
The Pulse of Radio reports: AEROSMITH guitarist Joe Perry has worked with a lot of the same music business personnel as the late Michael Jackson, and says he even met Jackson once, during the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame ceremony at which AEROSMITH was inducted. But Perry did not really know the late "King of Pop," and told The Pulse of Radio he's cautious about believing everything that's being said about Jackson since his shocking death last week. "I can't imagine what his life must have been like, and the things he had to deal with," he said. "You know, you read all the crap in the paper and who knows. There's so much stuff out there, so much rumors, so much going on, you know. There's no doubt that he, you know, saw the world and lived in a different kind of world than the rest of us could know, but unless I see stuff with my own eyes, I just don't put much credibility to it."
Jackson died at his rented Los Angeles home last Thursday (June 25). The cause of death is still yet to be determined.
The 50-year-old pop icon was about to make a comeback with a series of 50 shows at London's O2 Arena.
AEROSMITH is currently on tour with ZZ TOP and next performs on Wednesday night (July 1) in Cincinnati.
To report any abusive, obscene, defamatory, racist, homophobic or
threatening comments, or anything that may violate any applicable laws,
please send an e-mail to bmouth@bellatlantic.net
with pertinent details.
Anyone posting such material will be immediately and permanently banned. IP
addresses are recorded to aid us in enforcing these conditions.
COMMENT | you know, posted by : elexcomulgado 7/1/2009 10:53:44 AM
you know!
COMMENT | ^^^^^ posted by : FreddieC 7/1/2009 11:08:49 AM
Sleeping naked with little boys and showering with them can hardly be explained away with "He was making up for the thing he could've never done as a child".
COMMENT | posted by : Hellavator 7/1/2009 11:15:55 AM
Turns out that Jacko was using more dope than Joe in its toxic twins days.....Ironny.
MJ deffinition of hell: Being trapped with 12 hot 35 years old women and having to bang them all again and again.
COMMENT | Don't be afraid - just look at yourself posted by : PowerBrake 7/1/2009 1:20:35 PM
When you have time, point a finger at the strange black guy. Jackson had more talent in his pinky than all the narrow-minded talentless fools that love to talk shit about him
COMMENT | posted by : RiotAct666 7/1/2009 1:37:47 PM
RIP MJ
COMMENT | we're all to blame posted by : ozzyslovechild 7/1/2009 1:57:58 PM
we're all a little bit to blame for what michael became..
:)olc
COMMENT | Marilyn Mansauce posted by : BSlash24 7/1/2009 2:22:19 PM
that would be great if that was the extent of it, if he was just a man child...there was other evidence that shows there was more going on. Of course he's going to make it out that it was pure innocense. Maybe it was...maybe the parents were just explointing a rich man. Pretty shitty to use your child that way if they did, but people have done worse....But I don't think people are filled with sex & violence to think he may be guilty. There's alot pointing at him that says he is, lots of evidence, lots of people claiming the same.
COMMENT | BSlash24 posted by : NEWFILM2000 7/1/2009 3:13:55 PM
>>There's alot pointing at him that says he is, lots of evidence, lots of people claiming the same.
No, there isn't. If you read even just a little about the case, you quickly realize that the "evidence" is all contradictory, incomplete or completely made up and that the "claims" of former employees are either completely made up or contradictory to other testimony.
Back in the '90s and in the early '00s, when these allegations first came out, the media definitely made it seem like it was a slamdunk case against MJ, but, it wasn't. That's why he was quickly and unanimously acquitted.
Back in the '90s, when Bill Clinton was getting investigated for everything under the sun, the media made it seem like, at any moment, there would be a 'smoking gun,' and Clinton would be forced to resign or be impeached. Yet, now, in retrospect, it's pretty much understood that it was all a big $150 million waste of time, that did the country more harm than good.
It's the same with Michael Jackson - it was all a big waste of taxpayer money.
COMMENT | new film & tpanino posted by : BSlash24 7/1/2009 3:33:17 PM
I see, so this is a complete black & white case, and anyone who doesn't see the fact he's completely innocent is a moron...who's the moron?
#1, I would hope he is innocent. I'm NOT saying he isn't. I'm just saying, people aren't idiots or "morons" as that moron tpanino calls people. for thinking he might be guilty....and do your homework, there was evidence and statements that make one wonder. Maybe not evidence enough to confict him. Boys claimed jacko had booze. Porn around these kids as one of hte kids alleged...yes, its alleged, but it definitely feeds into my doubt. On the other hand I do consider that they may be lying to extort $$, take advantage of a rich guy....his behavior is at the very least in appropriate. Why does an adult man need to constantly sleep with little boys, innocent or not? Even if he doesn't play with their genitalia, its still got to raise an eyebrow. I guess not from you, cuz he's a modern day Peter Pan & has the $$ to buy off people or win in court....that could ALSO be the case...but again, maybe not.
.JUST the fact he paid off the family that was suing him, for $22 million, that doesn't seem at all a bit suspicious? If he was innocent, why would he do that instead of having his innocence proven in that case? Hmm? You could leave your kids around such a man, I'll pass....who's the fucking moron for not at least being suspicious or questioning that???...that's all I was suggesting, that the people that are questioning Jacko, are certainly within reason. Not morons.
COMMENT | NEWSFILM2000 posted by : rufus_creampie 7/1/2009 4:24:42 PM
He was not "quickly and unanimously acquitted."
That shit took awhile, dude. Try and make your points without slanting the facts.
COMMENT | NEWSFILM2000 posted by : FreddieC 7/1/2009 5:09:08 PM
From CNN:
"The jury deliberated about 32 hours throughout the course of seven days before reaching its decision."
Also, the only way to be acquitted is by a unanimous vote.
COMMENT | He was a musical genius posted by : JJJB 7/1/2009 6:11:28 PM
but as a man,he was a very sick delusional individual who was completely out of touch with reality. Probably on very many "medications" his whole life as well. It's sad really.
They have a whole rehearsal show shot in hi-def in the can. I'm sure we'll all see it someday. It'll be interesting to say the least.
COMMENT | @BSlash24 posted by : PatrickS77 7/1/2009 7:13:44 PM
Why he paid the first time round?? Easy! It was not his money, his insurance company coughed off the money!
That shit was blocking his career and life for 4 months... he just wanted this nightmare to end! So he agreed to the settlement! The trial would have taken much longer, with no guarantee of the outcome... and unlike usual procedures, the civil trial (where the alleged victim is asking for money) would have started before the criminal trial! A big disadvantage for any accused!
The second time around he didn't pay and the shit lasted for 1 and half years (charges filed in early December of 2003, aquital in mid-June of 2005)... 1 and a half years where his life was dragged through the mud and all his personal things had been laid open in front of the public!
If it doesn't hurt you, it's understandable if you agree to pay to make the shit go away... eventually it was a mistake... would he have fought out, there probably wouldn't have been a "second" trial (it never did get to a trial the first time round)!
COMMENT | posted by : BSlash24 7/2/2009 11:50:28 AM
you guys are right, there was NO nothing suspicious at all...and obviously tpanino you read only what you want to hear. Obviously your level of comprehension is limited. Keep putting words in my mouth, nice try. What my feelings are about the case have ZERO to do with the fact Jackson was found innocent.. you think court cases in the U.S are sound proof & legit. Please......I was not on a witchhunt at all...i fucking said I had my doubts regarding the case. Doubts from both camps....there is hard evidence, there is also lots of details in his life that I personally would question in this case. Yes, they may get thrown out of court, but I for one, while not on a witchhunt, don't just dismiss. A fool like you would.
Patrick, EXACTLY, he paid it off cuz he could. If he was completely innocent, why not clear your name & save $22mil?....and yes, it lasted 1.5years, not like the other guy said "it was instantly dismissed"...I wonder if Jacko wasn't a millionaire if he would have won that case? It wasn't just a complete black & white case. But believe it was if you like.
COMMENT | @ posted by : PatrickS77 7/3/2009 2:26:41 AM
You should check your crompehension! If he wouldn't have been an millionaire, he wouldn't even gotten accused!
Why he didn't clear his name?? That was his intention, but because of aforementioned reasons, he let his insurance company pay for the settlement! He wanted the nightmare to end... immediatly, and it did end, immediatly after his insurance company paid!
BLABBERMOUTH.NET is run and operated independently of Roadrunner Records. The accuracy of the information
contained herein is neither confirmed nor guaranteed by Roadrunner Records, and the views and opinions of
authors expressed on these pages do not necessarily state or reflect those of Roadrunner Records or its employees.