Username
Password


  Remember Me

    





















WITCHERY
"Witchkrieg"
Witchkrieg





INSIDIOUS DISEASE
"Shadowcast"
Shadowcast





HELLYEAH
"Stampede"
Stampede





SOILWORK
"The Panic Broadcast"
The Panic Broadcast





SABATON
"Coat of Arms"
Coat of Arms









Last Updated: July 30, 2010 5:40 AM




SAMMY HAGAR Says EDDIE VAN HALEN Is 'Not As Prolific' As JOE SATRIANI - Aug. 31, 2009
Russell Hall of Gibson.com recently conducted an interview with CHICKENFOOT/ex-VAN HALEN singer Sammy Hagar. An excerpt from the chat follows below.

Gibson.com: Early on you described CHICKENFOOT as "like CREAM, without the jazz, with funk mixed in." Do you still feel that's a pretty apt description?

Hagar: Yes, it is. When I say it's like CREAM, it's because CREAM was a strange mix of players who you might not think would be compatible. You wouldn't think Jack Bruce's bass style, and Eric Clapton's really elegant guitar style, and Ginger Baker's jazzy, swing style would blend, but they did. The chemistry created a special sound. And I think that's also what we have in CHICKENFOOT. Chad's [Smith; drums] funky style, Joe's [Satriani; guitar] shredding, blues-based futuristic music, and Mike's [Anthony; bass] distinctive style … you wouldn't think those things would work, but the chemistry is very special

Gibson.com: Were there any disadvantages to working with really seasoned musicians? Was anyone set in his ways?

Hagar: There really is no disadvantage. We don't have those problems, and I hope we never do. The advantage of playing with guys who are this good is that when someone comes up with an idea, everyone learns it in about three seconds. You get songs so quickly you never get bored, and you never feel like the songs are being beaten to death, to the point where the life comes out of them. The songs stay fresh.

Gibson.com: How do Joe and Eddie Van Halen differ in their approach to the guitar and in their approach to songwriting?

Hagar: As a writer, Joe is faster. That makes him easier for me to work with, because I come up with things really fast as well. As soon as I hear a chord structure, I have a melody, instantly. And then five seconds later I'm writing lyrics. Working with Joe is great. If I say to him, "Hey, let's do something funky," next thing I know he's saying, "How about this?" It's like, bang, he's done. Whereas with Eddie, he would come back a week later and want to re-do something.

But that said, working with Eddie was great, and we wrote great songs together. The Van-Hagar stuff still holds up fantastically well, but it was a slow process. It took three years to write the "For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge" album. And when I tried to do the Van-Hagar reunion, in 2004, and we were trying to make a new record, Eddie could only squeeze three songs out. He's just not as prolific, and not as fast. So that's the difference between them as far as writing.

As far as playing goes, they're both phenomenal. The innovations Eddie came up with in early VAN HALEN — before I was in the band — were just so unique, he gets lots of points for that. But as just a straight-up player, who can play anything, and plays perfect every time, there's no one better than Joe.

Gibson.com: Was there ever any consideration of your playing some guitar on the CHICKENFOOT album? Or did you feel that doing so might interfere with your giving enough emphasis to vocals?

Hagar: I did want to put my emphasis on vocals, but had there been a need for me to play guitar, I would have played. Things were moving really fast. Joe and I would get together, and he would write some music, and I would come up with some words and melody. It happened so fast there wasn't time for me to learn the guitar part. First thing I knew, the song we were working on would be finished, and in the can. It took just 43 days in the studio write and record the whole album.

Read the entire interview from Gibson.com.
To report any abusive, obscene, defamatory, racist, homophobic or threatening comments, or anything that may violate any applicable laws, please send an e-mail to bmouth@bellatlantic.net with pertinent details. Anyone posting such material will be immediately and permanently banned. IP addresses are recorded to aid us in enforcing these conditions.
COMMENT | Really?
posted by : metaltrigz
8/31/2009 6:10:34 AM

"Mike's [Anthony; bass] distinctive style " Riding that 8th note is a distinct style?

COMMENT | Blow it out your ass, Sammy.
posted by : ThisIsMyUsername
8/31/2009 6:49:28 AM

I saw them last week. They put on a "decent" live show, but I really think the Chickenfoot material was mediocre at best. They should've just toured as the world's best cover band or something because that's what the audience responded to.

COMMENT | The difference...
posted by : lazyspud
8/31/2009 6:50:13 AM

Is that Eddie takes 3 years to write a #1 album that sells millions. The Chickenfoot record sounds like it was written fast, with zero thought put into it. Being prolific doesn't translate into good songs.

COMMENT |
posted by : Skanna
8/31/2009 7:31:15 AM

no new van halen album since 98, then he's right.



COMMENT | duh
posted by : Doobsey
8/31/2009 7:40:24 AM

Van Halen is a used to be. At least Chickenfoot is in the here and now. And if you don't think MA has a distinctive style, you're not a bass player or a musician and obviously not very wise.

COMMENT | Sorry Doobsey
posted by : metaltrigz
8/31/2009 7:55:23 AM

I guess I was a bit harsh. But I do think "distinctive" is a bit strong. Steve Harris, Geezer Butler, Les Claypool and Cliff Burton all have/had very distinctive styles. You can tell it's them instantly. I just never got that from Michael. Again, my apologies.

COMMENT |
posted by : toadload
8/31/2009 8:25:04 AM

What a joker. Someone said it right above: the Chickencoop thing sounds like a quick set of jams inspired the record while Van Halen cd's took their time (at least the latter half of their cds did)

The difference is that Satch is a very good player. Van Halen is the best.

COMMENT | michael anthony!
posted by : vlad.death-o-mat
8/31/2009 8:28:47 AM

Well, michael anthony may not be unique... he does have a liquor shaped bass and apparently (used to) love to par-TAY!

COMMENT |
posted by : Nickodinho
8/31/2009 8:35:36 AM

yeah but satriani has never written a riff as great as "unchained"!!

COMMENT | EVH
posted by : vanbasten6247
8/31/2009 9:07:34 AM

may be a character, but I would prefer him inmediatly instead Satriani. Not saying Satriani is bad or anything, quite the contrary, but EVH is just great at everything related to guitar playing (innovative, great technique, incredible ability to play the instrument, catchy riffing, awesome soloing, superb stage presence), or at least I like him more, it's a matter of taste I guess.

COMMENT |
posted by : kisskissrules
8/31/2009 9:18:23 AM

There is no comparison at all between Van Halen & Chickenfoot, Van Halen blows them away. Chickenfoot will be lucky if they last long enough to make 3 albums. Eddie might take his time but look at the results.

COMMENT |
posted by : Neil Young's Cocaine Booger
8/31/2009 9:29:31 AM

Van Halen?????? You mean the nostalgic band that haven't released any new material since the Van Hagar reunion????? The band that hasn't released a CD with all new material since the Clinton Adminstration?????

COMMENT | ...
posted by : Woke Up Dead
8/31/2009 9:33:08 AM

If Chickenfoot wasn't famous before they started they never would have gotten famous. I don't understand why people even bother with this thrown together garbage. Satriani is full of potential but seems to rarely reach it lately and the rest of them well... if you don't have anything nice to say...

COMMENT |
posted by : Aces_High99
8/31/2009 9:41:39 AM

Michael Anthony is a good bassist, but to put him up there with Geezer, 'Arry, Geddy Lee, etc. is preposterous.

And no, I don't think he has what one would call a distinct style. He played a few cool bass licks in VH, but for the most part he just held down the fort while Eddie did his thing...and there's NOTHING wrong with that.

That's what a bassist is supposed to do. Fancy bass playing is cool if you can pull it off, but it's hardly a requirement for a good rock'n'roll band.

COMMENT | misleading
posted by : BSlash24
8/31/2009 9:58:51 AM

that headline is a bit exaggerated. And Sam didn't work with Eddie during his prime, when he was full of ideas....he's hardly prolific now, no albums in 10 years, but he also could be more prolific if he was just writing bar-band music, ala Chickenfoot.

Quality, not quantity. Again, EVH's day is over, but so is Joe's really. And 50 years from now, who's song writing output will be more remembered. Joe's "prolific" output now with CF is just a #'s game, Joe & Sam, or Ed could write an album in 3 days of basic bar rock.

COMMENT |
posted by : Acid_Rain
8/31/2009 10:29:59 AM

what MA had that made him stand out was his vocal harmony, not his bass playing.

COMMENT |
posted by : slunky
8/31/2009 10:36:36 AM

Joe Satriani is 'Not As Prolific' as Buckethead



COMMENT | Eddie & Joe
posted by : RiotAct666
8/31/2009 11:09:50 AM

Are both great guitarist and songwriters in their own each ways.

COMMENT |
posted by : wooten
8/31/2009 11:17:57 AM

I love both players, but Eddie can obviously write pretty quick when he wants to, with 8 studio records in 10 or so years (yeah, I know he had years to write the first and Diver Down had lots of covers, but still).

COMMENT |
posted by : wooten
8/31/2009 11:22:45 AM

Joe and Eddie both have things that they do better than the other. No point trying to say who's the "best".

COMMENT | Chickencoop...HA!!!
posted by : cocaine cowboy
8/31/2009 11:37:02 AM

that's a good one. These guys are cashing in on their histories, period.

maybe if Sammy took more than 5 minutes to write lyrics, he could write some decent ones?

Joe Satriani would have to stand on Sammy Hagar's shoulders to kiss EVH's ass

Mike Anthony...don't have a bad word to say about him. I think he's under-rated as a player actually. With a madman like Ed on guitar, his no-frills bass style is a big part of what made early VH so DRIVING. I wanted chickenfoot to be good, just for Mike's sake...alas, they are not.

COMMENT | Spammy, Spammy, Spammy...
posted by : matthalen
8/31/2009 11:40:12 AM

C'mon Spammy...you just had to throw that jab in there about Eddie. If you want to talk about "not as prolific", how about how much your voice has deteriorated?

Once again (yawn), no Eddie, no Joe. When Eddie is sober and has his mind right, which admittedly are his demons, no one is close to him. You should stop asking the damn lead singer about guitarists and start asking guitarists about guitarists, then you'll get the scoop. Spammy is a second rate guitar player that was always jealous of Eddie's playing. Give this situation time and he'll be jealous of Joe too.

COMMENT | the difference is
posted by : Sharon Tate Baby
8/31/2009 12:20:14 PM

Joe Satriani and Steve Vai type players can shred. They are great lead players. There are only a few like Randy Rhoads and EVH that can both write amazing riffs and shred at the same time.

COMMENT |
posted by : Acacia70
8/31/2009 12:27:43 PM

Michael Anthony was the perfect fit for VH. he kept it int he pocket much like Cliff Williams or Ian Hill...but prolific? No. Not even close. he did have some great backing vocals though.

COMMENT | Sammy Buffet
posted by : ThermanGilly
8/31/2009 1:22:20 PM

I used to really enjoy Van Hagar but lately Sammy is just really annoying me. I know he's always been this "carefree happy" guy who likes to party or whatever, but his persona as of late is just getting ridiculous. He seems more Jimmy Buffet than anything and he and Mike are all about the Hawaiian shirts, Tequila, salsa and partyin'! Ohhh yeaahhh babe-ay! It's just a bit much for me. The music on the new music sounds tired to me and the name Chickenfoot is even worse.

COMMENT | SharonTate'sBaby
posted by : BSlash24
8/31/2009 1:36:36 PM

you said it. that's what addicted to chaous is missing, and many shred heads, there's more to guitar playing than speed. Ed swings. Ed can apply his playing to song....I'm not dissing Joe's instrumentals. its opinion as to who you'd rather listen to, but because Joe might play that much more precise, or fast, isn't a barometer of great playing....and the same can be said comparing Ed to "slower" players that might have different strengths.

McMan, have you seen or heard clips of the original VH up to 1981? You think their stage performance(CF) out does that? Come on! If you are saying the chemistry is better that they are better buddies & hug more, who cares. The original VH was one of rock's greatest live acts in history....CF aint touching that, not at 55-60 years old alone.

COMMENT |
posted by : shapechangerVII
8/31/2009 1:46:32 PM

This band is retarded. And they suck. And so do you.

COMMENT | Here we go!
posted by : sgt.hartman
8/31/2009 3:45:57 PM

Katie bar the doors!!! Annie, where's my gun?? Sam's talking smack about Ed again!



COMMENT |
posted by : steve_oz_49
8/31/2009 5:06:51 PM

I do think that there is something to be said for taking your time and getting it right... rather than just throwing something together. I take nothing away from Satch but like someone above said "Unchained". Satch is phenomenal and taught a few guitarists that have become great in their own right. In my opinion, Eddie has created some of the greatest riffs from '78-94. Women and Children First is a great album with some of my favorite riffs.

COMMENT | cocaine cowboy
posted by : broham
8/31/2009 6:08:11 PM

apt name...apparently the white powder has impaired your judgment.

first off, sammy is a grade a idiot. he needs to shut his stupid fucking mouth and focus on singing. everything little jab he says against vh just makes him look like a bigger moron than he already is.

secondly, vh is a living legend on guitar. he was a true innovator and was his generation's hendrix. he definitely molded modern rock guitar as we know it.

that being said, anything vh can do, joe can do better. it's just true. joe is more technical, more musical, more melodic, faster, etc. from a technica standpoint, there is no disputing that joe owns vh.

everything else is just purely subjective. you people who say "joe will never write a riff as good as vh". what exactly does that mean? from a musically theoretical point of view, joe write much more complex material (on his solo albums). if you're looking from a purely popular point of view, well i guess that means george harrison is better than vh then because he wrote more well known and higher grossing 'riffs'. it's a stupid benchmark. i love vh riffs. they are great, musical and catchy. i love satch riffs. they are complex, musical and melodic. we're just talking about different flavors.

and while joe does own vh technically, there would be no joe without vh. just like there'd be no vh without hendrix (as much as vh would like to deny it).

COMMENT | Eddie was great?
posted by : joshtorock
8/31/2009 6:39:57 PM

WAS great, now it is Satriani's turn.
Sorry Van Halen is burnt toast.

And you haters, Hagar is the KING of Rock !

COMMENT |
posted by : bringbackacidbath
8/31/2009 7:08:45 PM

EVH is without a doubt better than Joe Satriani and more influential.

But he is donezo. Eddie is never coming back.

So I say ROCK ON CHICKENFOOT!!!

Also, it pisses me off that Van Halen has now basically followed The Eagles formula of exponentially ripping off their fans.

COMMENT | joshtorock
posted by : Ronnie Black
8/31/2009 7:39:13 PM

Hagar is the KING of Rock???? More the king of cheese. His onstage antics are some of the most cringeworthy ever. Great singer does not mean great frontman. Look at Dave, not the best singer, but nobody can touch what he did on stage. Just the same way prolific doesn't mean good, either. Big Satch fan, but he won't come near what Ed did. He's not a hit song guy.


COMMENT |
posted by : munomi
8/31/2009 7:58:46 PM

For the people responding that chickenfoot is worthless as a band then you just don't like rock or hate Hagar. just Fact. I was at the Charlotte concert the other night and flat out it was the best concert I've seen in years. It was by far Hagars best efforts since 1991. For a guy in his 60's he sounded and acted a much younger man. I know some nay sayers will disagree but for a $ this is the show to see.

As for the comparison of Satch and Ed well it was spot on. Satch has some very amazing early stuff just as early VH. Just cuz' you don't know of his stuff doesn't mean you can discount his ablility. Sam, was just saying Ed takes a long time to write. Nothing more or less.

COMMENT | Saved 12$ Saturday
posted by : benouitayeule
8/31/2009 8:50:44 PM

It's cool they that have listening posts in record stores...2-3 days ago I finally listened to Chickenfoot's album. The name probably kept me away from it all these months. Did not like it sounded to much like ou812.. Left it on the shelf and took my 12$ home.

In my book, VH should have retired after 5150.

Although, I would certainly give a chance to a new VH record with DLR on vocals.

And please, put out the dvd from the recent DLR-VH reunion tour !!! I want that badly. I am pretty sure they taped a few... Maybe DLR is putting the final touches on his vocals. Heard he sucked live.

COMMENT | Great Band, Great Songs, Okay Album
posted by : sixstringmonk
8/31/2009 8:58:41 PM

In my experience this is one of those albums were the songs stand much better on their own as opposed to framed in with the rest of the album. I think the album suffers because most of the songs are similar, albeit good. Often I'll find myself getting bored with the album, but I'm rocking out whenever I hear one of the songs on the radio or internet. I do agree to a degree that a lot of the songs sound born from a Jam. That's how this band was started. I wonder if that feel will change on the 2nd album. I definitely think this band will grow over the next couple albums since they have most likely grown a lot together over the past year.


COMMENT | He's Right...
posted by : jstarr2000
8/31/2009 9:37:38 PM

Eddie has been doing the same solo for 20 years. Joe has his own thing that he does incredibly well. And it's always changing.

COMMENT | Bottom line
posted by : Expanded Consciousness
8/31/2009 9:49:54 PM

Eddie is an artist.
Satriani sounds like a computer.

Sammy is a used car salesman.


COMMENT | CHICKENFOOT=unspired, fat, bloated, and rich mediocrity.
posted by : JakeE.GeddyLeeRoth
8/31/2009 10:58:11 PM

Did Satriani write Unchained, Panama, Hot For Teacher, Somebody Get Me A Doctor, Eruption, Aint Talkin Bout Love, On Fire, Mean Street, Everybody Wants Some, etc., etc.,etc? No I didn't think so. Joe isn't even playing a solo on this tour. Lame.

COMMENT | broham
posted by : Sharon Tate Baby
8/31/2009 11:29:58 PM

your logic is so wacked that you even contradict yourself.

Also, saying that if there was no Hendrix then there would be no EVH is completely asinine. Maybe without Clapton there is no Eddie but really who is to say. Van Halen and Hendrix, while both great, are like apples and oranges.

COMMENT | quantity vs quality
posted by : ballfoam
9/1/2009 1:26:47 AM

Guitarists are not "better" then one another, they are different from each other. What a dumb thing to say.

COMMENT | Ha Ha Ha Ha, you Haters are all non rock fans.
posted by : deathmetal4u81
9/1/2009 6:14:42 AM

Sammy is bigger than life right now and you DLR lovers hate it, gayboy Roth is washed up just like his buddy Eddie Van Halen, living off the past, not working for the future.
Hey there is a Chickenfoot song just about that, "Future in the Past"

So to you haters out there that are jealous, go suck a CHICKENFOOT.

/|\

COMMENT | Chickenfoot is the hottest band in rock right now
posted by : Get up and make it work
9/1/2009 6:27:47 AM

All you haters can't deny the facts.

What Sam is really saying is that Joe comes to work everyday ready to go. No baggage. Ed struggles to get out bed 3 days a weeks after toking on the meth pipe and guzzling down a vat full of Smoking Loon.

COMMENT |
posted by : Angrysun
9/1/2009 9:25:55 AM

Hashing it out faster doesn't mean better. I like both players a lot but EVH wrote the most amazing riffs in rock history. Joe is the best instrumental guitarist there ever was...

COMMENT | SharonTate
posted by : BSlash24
9/1/2009 9:37:59 AM

I agree with alot of what you're saying, but I don't think EVH & HEndrix are/were apples & oranges. EVH circa 1978, live, was way Hendrix sounding. Tons of feedback, his wammy use at the time, especially during his Eruption solo, in that era. He then sort of moved on, but he took alot from Hendrix. yes, he worshipped Clapton, & learned all his riffs, but sounded less like him.

Broham, I couldn't disagree with you more. While just writing a riff isn't a benchmark of playing, but neither is just shredding. There are so many ingredients to great playing, and the George Harrison example is perfect. He might not blaze the fret board, but he created so many different sounds, songs, that you can't dismiss his playing. Good slide player, many dimensions....EVH is one of my favorites, but he plays Van Halen music. He is very one dimensional....

Joe is amazing. For sure. And I'll agree with Sam, he is never sloppy, and can probably play many other styles the EVH doesn't(I didn't say "couldn't" though). Joe is more of a cameleon....But where the riffs/songs come into play, is EVH will be remembered years from now for those songs/riffs. He has more of a legacy that JOe doeesn't have. There are a million shredders that can play so fast, so technical, but they are a dime a dozen. you have to create with that "talent", or you'll be just lumped into a pile of shred guitars.

COMMENT | Getup&makeitwork
posted by : BSlash24
9/1/2009 9:45:21 AM

You're a piece of work, you rant at the "haters" on the CF posts, then you're off & doing the "hating" on other posts(KiSS). Hypocritical, no?

EVH may have had his day, but many are writing "let Satch have his day now, its his turn". Satch is fucking 50+ too. Both are well beyond their creative peaks...and Satch certainly didn't raise the creative bar in Chickenfoot, that's for sure. He dumbed his playing up if anything. That's fine, but his forte is sort of "out there", creative, instrumental guitar. I think he should have kept some of those elements....but Sam wouldn't know what to do with that, he'd be lost....hard to write "wam bam" or "I love you baby" to some far out guitar music.

COMMENT | cheezy chorus
posted by : donkeydog
9/1/2009 2:12:28 PM

i love all of this music of both bands, though quite often, pretty much ever since Right Now, the chorus has gotten cheezier and cheezier to the point that it kills a perfect song. Wham Bam smoke and amsterdam, cheeze ball, though phenomenal song otherwise. same shit with chickenfoot.... eddie is a god with his twist and edge...

COMMENT | Oh Sammy, Sammy, Sammy....
posted by : DLR_EngineRoom
9/1/2009 5:00:42 PM

In the immortal words of one Gary Cherone:

"If you don't like what you see here...

< ahem >

GET THE FUNK OUT!"

Gary deserved the RnR HOF award more than you did, you swine.

It must hurt getting your @$$ kicked so severely by the mighty, classic Van Halen.

Shove it, you almighty schmuck. Tired of your yappin'.

COMMENT | ...oh and one other thing
posted by : DLR_EngineRoom
9/1/2009 5:01:42 PM

Mike Anthony USED to kick ass, now he just wishes.

COMMENT | DLREngineroom
posted by : sgt.hartman
9/1/2009 5:37:52 PM

Funny you mention that. I overheard Sammy just the other day, between Chickenfoot gigs and interviews and signing autographs, and making videos, etc. say something like "it really hurts getting my ass kicked so severly by the mighty classic Van Halen."

COMMENT |
posted by : donkeydog
9/1/2009 9:26:19 PM

I am stoked that these guys are making music. Hope it lights a fire under Van Halen's ass. Should expect a different sound without anthony's background vocals. Though, I find that dlr knew how to direct anthony's vocals better than sammy does. Dont get me wrong i love both van halen's, both super unique, no one favorite over the other....though, Michael Anthonys vocals are not and have not been used very well since right now. What the fuck are these cheezy choruses. Now that comes from song writing. cliche "Oh Yeah", yeah yeah yeah..blah blah blah, ruining a perfect song... get away from the cliche lyrics,,, maybe cliche lyrics come from people who live in a way too cushioned world...

COMMENT | The almighty Van Halen has been junk for the past 11 years.
posted by : Gunner1234
9/2/2009 4:00:05 PM

At least Chickenfoot has released; new material, and are doing a video/dvd, and going on tour, and doing interviews. Hey that sounds like it used to be when Sammy was with Van Halen, bring Sammy back to Van Halen if you want more Van Halen.
But, until then Chickenfoot is all we got.

Rock On.

/|\

COMMENT | _-_-_-_-_-Eddie is a lost soul-_-_-_-_-_
posted by : vinny3888s
9/2/2009 4:08:07 PM

Without his friend and comrade Sammy Hagar.

COMMENT | Sammy is the winner here!
posted by : grlpwr
9/2/2009 4:25:04 PM

I always will love the older Van Halen, but it is 2009, so that means the older Van Halen is Van Hagar.

Van Hagar all the way!!!!!!!

COMMENT |
posted by : guitz
9/3/2009 4:40:10 PM

I like Chickenfoot (GREAT fun at their shows, just check out the youtube clips!)...I like Van Halen with Roth, and with Hagar....Does this mean the interwebs will now shut down? :P

ps - Satch vs. Eddie is a fun topic for funs sake of course.....Eddie is such an innovator and has that brilliant ballsy, flashy virtuoso technique in EVERY riff , note and solo. He's one of a kind, even the virtuoso's of today will tell you that. Satch is my favorite rock player today. He's supremely capable on the instrument of course, but I love his inherent melodicism in the stuff he writes. My only quibble , is that he doesn't expand a bit from simple (yet very catchy) progressions into headier waters , like he touches on now and then with his beautiful instrumentals, like the song Time, love that one....

the other cool surprise about Chickenfoot, you can actually make out and follow Michael Anthony's bass lines! He's solid as a rock, I never really noticed (probably 'caused he was mixed low) him on VH's records per se, but then again, I was listening for Eddie.

COMMENT |
posted by : donkeydog
9/11/2009 12:49:15 PM

chickenfoot kicks ass. i take it back, have been listening hard to these guys for the last couple of weeks, and it's the shit. awesome all around. a couple throw back choruses, but mostly kick ass. wicked harmonies, kick ass leads, awesome heavier vocals, all around all aboard!

COMMENT | GET IT UP
posted by : weskay
9/19/2009 9:22:49 AM

Saw Chickenfoot in Chicago. It simply was a great show. Stellar performance, sound and everything that makes a great rock show. Sammy,s voice sounded great. Unbeleivable at 61. Check it out on youtube . I love the new album. I also saw VH on the reunion tour in Chicago 2007. it was a very fun show, and we had a blast. But first of all it was so disappointing that MH wasnt there and it didnt seem like Dave liked being up there with Wolfie, and Wolfie seemed to stay back out of his way as far as he could. Eddies was great. Does have some of the greatest riffs ever ( along with Angus Young ). But Daves voice at best was rough, he struggled. And he looked like he was stuck in super glue. For as powerful as VH songs are I expected more energy from him. So to compare the two singers now, no doubt Sammy kills Dave. I just cant beleive VH would put the kid up there.



In order to post a comment, please log in first.
If you aren't signed up, sign up now.


BLABBERMOUTH.NET is run and operated independently of Roadrunner Records. The accuracy of the information contained herein is neither confirmed nor guaranteed by Roadrunner Records, and the views and opinions of authors expressed on these pages do not necessarily state or reflect those of Roadrunner Records or its employees.

|
Latest News | News Archive | CD Reviews | DVD Reviews | Contact | Submit News |
| Advertise | Wireless | Privacy Policy |

 
UPDATE YOUR PROFILE LOGOUT Latest News News Archive CD Reviews DVD Reviews Contact Submit News Advertise Wireless