KISS members Gene Simmons and Paul Stanley discussed the 35th anniversary of "Alive!" last month on "In The Studio - The Stories Behind History's Greatest Rock Bands" with professional radio broadcaster and rock musician interviewer Redbeard. Paul and Gene also talked about the band's beginnings, KISS concerts in their early years, as well as the new album, "Sonic Boom", and the current state of the recording industry. Listen to the program in three parts below.
"Sonic Boom" sold 108,000 copies in the United States in its first week of release to land at position No. 2 on The Billboard 200 chart. This marks the band's highest-charting LP ever.
KISS has notched eight Top 10 albums, according to Billboard.com. Its previous highest-charting set was 1998's "Psycho Circus", which debuted and peaked at No. 3 with 110,000 copies in its first week, according to Nielsen SoundScan. The group's other high-charting sets include 1975's "Alive!" (No. 9), 1977's "Love Gun" (No. 4) and 1992's "Revenge" (No. 6).
"Sonic Boom" was released in Europe on October 5 via Loud & Proud/Roadrunner Records. The CD was made available in the U.S. and Canada on October 6 exclusively via Wal-Mart, Walmart.com and Sam's Club retail locations.
KISS filmed footage for the "Modern Day Delilah" video during the band's private warm-up show at Cobo Arena in Detroit, Michigan on September 24. Over 1,500 lucky fans attended the event, where the group also previewed its new stage and taped two songs for an episode of "Jimmy Kimmel Live!"
Part 1:
Part 2:
Part 3:
To report any abusive, obscene, defamatory, racist, homophobic or
threatening comments, or anything that may violate any applicable laws,
please send an e-mail to bmouth@bellatlantic.net
with pertinent details.
Anyone posting such material will be immediately and permanently banned. IP
addresses are recorded to aid us in enforcing these conditions.
COMMENT | Time to come clean posted by : Get up and make it work 11/3/2009 11:39:11 AM
On how the majority of this album was recorded in the studio.
COMMENT | posted by : vlad.death-o-mat 11/3/2009 11:49:19 AM
what a great "live" band... NOW WITH OVERDUBS!
COMMENT | posted by : G-bone 11/3/2009 11:59:17 AM
I can't believe they still admit it was live when it's well documented that it was studio.
COMMENT | posted by : GoatLoad71 11/3/2009 12:28:09 PM
They did it for the FAN'S !! So they could have the excitment of a KISS show in their bedrooms @ home under the giant KISS poster, as they lip synched in the mirror and had Rock & Roll dreams of there own.. Judas Priest has done the same thing on a Unleashed in the East, so I have heard..
with fixing up a live recording in the studio. Have you seen how shitty parts of the Cobo 75 show was? Gene forgetting lyrics, Paul's voice squeaking on Black Diamond (I know, shit that still happens today, especialy on the new tour).
To make a good live album, it sometimes takes more than just a soundboard recording, mistakes are often made in a live setting, but it's easiest to ignore on a first listen when you're in the 5th row, rocking the fuck out.
Alive! is the best fucking live album there is. Everything else that followed was just following the standards that that album set.
COMMENT | KISS Alive! posted by : KISSOFF 2004 11/3/2009 12:48:47 PM
... remains one of the greatest albums of all time. A fact even Rolling Stone acknowledges.
Personally speaking ... It's a watershed album/moment in my life.
I'll check this interview out later. I've always liked the 'In The Studio' radio program.
NP: King's X 'Tapehead'
COMMENT | posted by : AC/DC 4ever 11/3/2009 12:48:59 PM
Fixing live recordings in post-production is nothing new. In fact, one of the biggest live albums of all-time, Frampton Comes Alive, was done almost entirely in the studio..
COMMENT | Kiss Alive! = one of the best albums ever made posted by : RiotAct666 11/3/2009 1:11:33 PM
It it right up there among the legendary recordings.
COMMENT | We got the best in Alive! posted by : MRSPEED 11/3/2009 1:29:00 PM
Anyone who trashes Alive should really see KISS live. I've seen KISS twice in the last few months. It takes time for Paul's voice to get warmed up and it's not what it used to be. As for Gene I don't know if you can count what he does as singing any way. Put KISS against any other band live and they blow them away. Especially newer bands. The fact is they do it live. So what if Alive was touched up. It provided us all with a great sounding record that made you feel like you were there.
COMMENT | It was FIXED in the studio posted by : THRASHMONGER 11/3/2009 1:49:09 PM
but was largely based on live shows, as evidenced by some of the untampered tunes floating around.
I fucking HATE the canned audience on ALIVE (and ESPECIALLY on Alive II), but that aside, it's still a great album no matter how you slice it.
COMMENT | MRSPEED posted by : JRSPON 11/3/2009 1:49:59 PM
As Ace would say - I Concur - I would put Kiss up against any band live, I remember in Atlanta a few years ago when Kiss got off stage, then Aerosmith took the stage, i thionk the 22,000 capacity that Kiss played for went to 8,000 for Aerosmith.
COMMENT | posted by : JRSPON 11/3/2009 1:51:21 PM
Kiss blowed Aerosmith off of the stage in ways un known to man kind. And every one there seen it .
COMMENT | Aerosmith in 2003 was better than kiss posted by : LetmePost09101112 11/3/2009 1:59:16 PM
gene was looking like a dumb foo.
Kiss DEAD 35 years dead of kiss.
IM LIVING IN THE LIGHT
COMMENT | okay 30 kiss years Dead posted by : LetmePost09101112 11/3/2009 1:59:42 PM
kiss was okay for five years.
COMMENT | if gene and paul LEAVE ITS NOT kiss posted by : LetmePost09101112 11/3/2009 2:00:03 PM
bye bye. kiss LMFAO!
COMMENT | U2 to wear face paint of the Flag of Ireland posted by : LetmePost09101112 11/3/2009 2:00:57 PM
COOL!!!! I LOVE U2 so much!
COMMENT | I am not a fan of posted by : Gigantor 11/3/2009 2:04:21 PM
Tommy Thayer. The Aeosmith tour was the last time I went to a kiss tour, after seeing every tour since 1975.
That being said, they did blow away Aerosmith.
COMMENT | ALIVE posted by : tommthos666 11/3/2009 2:05:49 PM
The only thing live on KISS ALIVE is the audience.
COMMENT | Aerosmith blew them away. posted by : LetmePost09101112 11/3/2009 2:24:56 PM
KISS Alive was doctored, according to Eddie Kramer who produced the album:
Overdubbing controversy
There has been considerable debate as to how much use was made of studio overdubs. Gene Simmons states in his autobiography Kiss and Make-Up that very little corrective work was done in the studio and that most of the studio time was devoted strictly to mixing down the multi-track recordings. He also emphasized that Kiss could not have done extensive overdubbing even if they had wanted to; thanks in no small part to the Johnny Carson album fiasco, the extremely meager budget allotted to the band simply would not allow it.
According to Dale Sherman's book Black Diamond and Goldmine magazine, in the early 1990s, Eddie Kramer stated there were a few overdubs to correct the most obvious mistakes: strings breaking or off-key notes, for instance. However, in recent years, Kramer has stated that the only original live recording on the album is Ace Frehley's guitar. In a recent televised interview, he also stated the only original live recording on the album is Peter Criss' drums. In addition, on the recent VH1 special of the story of Kiss, the band members themselves make it more known that the album was severely doctored in the studio, and various musicians comment on the album in this special, revealing how disappointed they were to find out their heroes doctored the supposed "live" album in the studio.
Paul Stanley has noted that there's a bass mistake in the choruses of "C'mon and Love Me." He's also made comments that even though there have been live albums recorded later that make Alive! sound like it was recorded in a washroom, he has no qualms about it.
COMMENT | gene is dog crap shi posted by : LetmePost09101112 11/3/2009 3:20:35 PM
he has pooped on his fans too long BRUCE KULICK The Dog>on bass for kiss Rip gene did he die
type in google, yahoo gene simmons jumpin died at 60 gene is 60 now.
COMMENT | This is one of those things that kill me... posted by : Sonic Titan 11/3/2009 3:54:53 PM
about KISS and the sheep that just can't admit that KISS is full of lies. I love Alive and Alive II but both albums were doctored. Lots of bands put out live albums that get the post mixing treatment but KISS actually went and tracked in to the tapes with different parts thus making it a studio project. KISS is (or was) an awesome band live but PEEEEEEEEEEEEPLE Alive is not a true live album. Just get over that fact. No need to make excuses for it. It is what it is. Live + studio. End of story.
COMMENT | dubbed posted by : BSlash24 11/3/2009 4:45:17 PM
Scott's OJ, there's another VH1 show, Album Classics, where Eddie Kramer breaks down the album, including what he did on overdubs, adding layers of crowd noise to boost the excitement level, etc. Not knocking KiSS, cuz they all did it, but that is a very detailed account of what went down.
GenesBurger, have a listen to Criss' fills in the studio of "ladie's room". Pitiful on every level. Entry level fill, recorded poorly, & he does the SAME fill each time, right before the chorus. Again, not ranking on KiSS, but if you want to point out Peter's Fills on R&R over(which was 1976 btw), they are alarmingly poor. Fills that you'd learn from a 60's jingle, or a 60's surf song.
COMMENT | "Alive" has many actual live tracks recorded........... posted by : MRBILL40 11/3/2009 4:45:58 PM
Dudes,
Alive 1 , 2 , 3 & 4 do / does feature actual live recordings on various tracks..... But yes, of course their are some overdubs to fill in certain flaws and gaps........ In my book, as long as the vibe of a live sound is there, let it be.....
I've listened to many live shows from many other rock bands.... I'm telling you, most totally live recordings sound like shit and contain excessive feedback, distortion, missed notes & vocal dropouts........... Who really wants to sit through that at home while kicking back to the stereo system cranked up??
COMMENT | ~ posted by : skatee123 11/3/2009 6:00:41 PM
Seriously Senor William, chill out dude. You post multitudes of KISS factoids like your some kind of a tour guide. As much as the negative comments about KISS annoy you, seeing your ass kissing filled comments on every story equally annoy me. Don't tell anyone to EFF OFF, cause if you do, expect to be told the same. Here's a better solution to your Blabbermouth conundrum, go start a site of your own, a blog, whatever, and post nothing but KISS 24/7, and invite all of your fellow KISS disciples to come with you. You'll be in KISS heaven. Or go to their website, I'm sure they have a forum there where you'll always be amongst like minded individuals. But let me tell ya, before you start your own KISSSSSSS club, make sure all your members take THE OATH!
COMMENT | Different views in KISS Behind The Mask - Official Bio posted by : Lorn 11/3/2009 6:12:05 PM
"The Official Authorized Biography" By David Leaf and Ken Sharp.
pg. 244 Peter Criss on Alive! "We had to touch things up. A lot of people do that. A lot of things were touched up; a lot of vocals, harmonies, guitar parts, bass parts, definitely drum parts. Just little parts because when you play live you play faster because your adrenaline is pumped up."
pg. 245 Ace Frehley on Alive! "Some of it was [re-recorded in the studio]. I don't really remember to what extent but some of the stuff just had to be fixed."
pg. 245 Paul Stanely on Alive! "Every album gets patched up a bit for all kinds of reasons. If you listen to "C'mon and Love Me" there's a bass mistake that goes throughout the whole song, every time we go into the chorus. It's by no means perfect. When I listen to it now, I know I could have fixed up the vocals and really done a much better job on the songs. But I think it's as honest as it needs to be. It's anything but flawless. If we wanted a really flawless record, we would have doctored it up, but it's as close to live as it needs to be. I have no qualms about that."
pg. 246 Bill Aucoin on Alive! "We were editing and re-recording some of the live tracks at Electric Lady for Alive! Most of the live album wasn't really live, but that's not unusual for live albums to be touched up."
pg. 246 Gene Simmons on Alive! "It happened so long ago. I do remember going back in and redoing some of the vocals, but I think by and large what you heard is what you got. There's certainly enough mistakes on there."
pg. 246 Eddie Kramer on Alive! "As far as I'm concerned a lot more was re-recorded than what they remember. Quite frankly some of the songs we stripped back and just left the drums and re-recorded the bass, and Paul's rhythm guitar. Ace's guitar generally speaking was not too bad but even then we had to replace some stuff. Quite a few vocals. You know, with all that jumping around it was impossible to get an accurate performance...It was somewhat re-created in the studio, but faithfully to the point where it sounded live...I don't think we were cheating. What we were doing was just fixing up a very, very tough live performance where the artists were not totally in control. I don't care how great you are, there is no way you can do the kind of stuff that KISS does onstage and come off sounding in tune and in time. It's impossible. So we didn't touch the drums, and we used the audiences that were there. We enhanced them and made them sound bigger and fatter and made the record sound good. Paul's voice was plopped in a few times to make it sound good, the same with the rhythm guitars, and the same with Ace's guitars. Most of his solos were kept intact. Peter's vocals were cool. We kept those. Paul's raps were just culled from various performances and edited together."
COMMENT | Great album. posted by : spaceace69 11/3/2009 6:15:20 PM
I just can't believe someone actually cited wikipedia for anything...........lol.
COMMENT | Genesburger posted by : emoslayer 11/3/2009 6:20:21 PM
It's funny that you mention that. I just got back from the back of my trailer playing air drums to Thief in the Night...funny shit...
Seriously though, I agree with you; why the fuck are so many Kiss fans tell you to suck their poles if you don't agree with them? It's funny because most of the time they're the ones who're wrong.
Speaking of which, I gotta correct ya, Rock And Roll Over came out in '76, not '75...
COMMENT | A comment on the above quotes posted by : Lorn 11/3/2009 6:23:49 PM
Not sure why I bothered. But I was kinda bored and had the time. So, obviously, by reading the above, you can see how selective memory works within Kiss for some of them, or how age and time affects some of them. I would also take not with the claim by Eddie Kramer that a good live performance by a band that runs around on stage is just not possible. I've looked into this a bit, and found that Iron Maiden's Rock in Rio live concert is pretty much a AS IS recording. There may be a minor fix or so, but from what I have read, it is the real deal. And who runs their asses off on stage more than Maiden? So it is possible. But I do understand what Kramer is getting at. I don't prefer it though. I think there are two kinds of live albums. Live type A which is the type that tires to re-create a live show and be idealistically what a live show for a band should/could be. A Commercial live, so to speak. And then there is live type B. The way it really is. I think the best way to make a live album is to record several shows, and then just take the best versions from each show and put it together. THAT is what I would rather see done most of the time. And then, if your a real obsessed fan, their are recording of individual shows AS IS. That's interesting, but not always going to be what everyone wants. That' the kind of thing fans would like to see bands offer though on their web sites, etc. Special deals.
But I don't like to see live albums advertised as live when thy really are messed with. They ought to come out in the liner notes and say what kind of live the album really is. Be up front about it. Or just make it a policy to only give real live, unaltered albums.
COMMENT | Memorex: Is it live or Memorex? posted by : MRBILL40 11/3/2009 8:11:27 PM
Again, I fully give a damn about some re-work done in the studio to aide and polish up a live recording so that it doesn't sound too harsh or off key upon playback..........
Personally, I like the vibe I get from Alive 1, 2 & 4.......... # 3 is not as good to me, but I still listen to it...... Are these recordings touched up / polished? Damn straight they are...... Still, the albums sound good and they rock......... I accept and deal with it....... Eddie Kramer did well, as did the Australian crew for # 4 did down under in 2003........
NOW! One of the worst live records that I have ever bought was Deep Purple's "Last Concert In Japan" that was recorded in late 1975 and features Tommy Bolin on lead guitar....... Christ Almighty, did the record company even bother to get an engineer or producer to go over the tapes prior to release??? Later on down the road, the company blamed a crappy mixing error for the poor quality of the recording...... WTF? That should've been caught and fixed long before the albums release in 1977......
And yes to all who already know that Judas Priest basically recorded "Unleashed In The East" in the studio with some vocal tracks recorded at Ringo Starr's house....... I like the material, however, that album is a total phony baloney deal to the max..... Still, it does rock for 1979.......
Again, point is, I don't mind some polish and touching up in the studio........ I do like a clean sound with a live vibe when I'm jamming my tunes....... Cheers.......
MR.BILL
COMMENT | Alive! posted by : zeets 11/3/2009 8:35:35 PM
This is a great album.......it's hardly "live' but it's an amazing album. I don't care if the majority of it was done in the studio, most "live" albums are studio creations anyway. Probably the best TRULY LIVE album is Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out by the Stones.
COMMENT | "Made In Japan" from Purple in '72 jams, but has plenty of noise, too. posted by : MRBILL40 11/3/2009 10:18:50 PM
I'm pretty sure that DP's '72 live album in Japan is basically fully live, but it is also flawed in that Ian Gillan's vocals are very horse on various tracks and several feedback type of squeals occur throughout the recording...... Still, I love the album........... However, while I love Blackmore's long-ass solos' and all, I do get bored with 15 minute drum solos and tiresome organ solos, etc........... But that stuff was popular in the early 70s......... "Made In Japan" is pretty raw............ Peace.....
MR.BILL
COMMENT | Genes'mazeeka'booger posted by : sepish1974 11/4/2009 12:30:51 AM
Damn! I just come to read the article and the posts and sure enough, as I was scrolling past your posts (as I always do), I see that you have brought my name into your mess. The whole problem that I have with you KISSbashers is the fact that there are many bands that you like and many that you don't, and it seems backwards as hell to me, to spend so much time telling everyone how much you can't stand KISS instead of singing the praises of you favorite bands. My grandfather told me a long time ago that if you don't have anything nice to say, then you shouldn't say anything at all. Show some respect and you'll get respect. Also, there is another old saying that says that it is better to have people think you are an idiot, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. Think about it. Who likes a whiney, complaining, party pooper? As far as Eric Singer goes, if you can't hear that he is a top notch drummer, then you are obviously listening with your eyes. And leave MRBILL40 alone, he has an opinion same as the rest of us. You can't very well complain about him bashing you for your opinion, and then you turn around and bash him for his. You get things started and then you perpetuate them. Simply give your two cents, and move on to the next thread. Cheers.
COMMENT | Alive!!!!!!!!!!!!! posted by : JRSPON 11/4/2009 9:14:39 AM
I still listen to all the Alive albums, i listen to AliveIII the most, mostly because of Bruce, The Creatures of the Night on this album is the best version ever, Detroit Rock City on Alive II is the best version of that one and played alot faster than today, and i actually like Alive IIII (symphony) a lot, to me all 4 are great.
COMMENT | I agree with zeets^^^^ posted by : brianca 11/4/2009 11:06:02 AM
No one should let the fact that work was done on ALIVE in the studio detract from the fact that ALIVE is a terrific album. All "live" albums require touch-ups in the studio. Live shows are unpredictable, and their are always things that need to be corrected.
I'm not certain to what degree ALIVE was "touched-up". Having heard many of the actually recordings from the original shows at Cobo and the other performances ALIVE was alleged culled from, it seems that this particular "live" record required more correcting that others. However, the artists still did the work and the end product was KISS performing. Enhancing crowd noises is just a product of poor planning by the production crew in not having enough microphones in the audience to record an accurate level of the crowd's enthusiasm.
Again, ALIVE is still a great record, regardless of what was done post-concert in the studio.
COMMENT | posted by : JRSPON 11/4/2009 11:39:35 AM
I know this has nothing to do with the Alive album, but one of my favorite Kiss dvd's of live stuff is the Paul Stanley One Live Kiss from the Live To Win Tour, that dvd is totaly killer, shows that Paul can do it with out makeup, pyro, smoke, just kick ass rock n roll, and killer stuff like Magic touch , and that is one of my favorite all time concerts, it is in there with a great Kiss concert.
okay, when i was growing up, "alive" was my absolute favourite album of all time! i wore out several copies. then, when the video footage of cobo was released on the "exposed" home video, i thought it was funny how different the video version and the album version of "strutter" were. over the years, it became apparent that "alive" was not, in fact, live at all but had been almost totally re-done in the studio.
at that point, "alive" lost a lot of its shine for me. i still like the album, but the shine is gone. all of those years, i thought i was listening to a potent rock and roll band at the peak of their skills playing to an audience who loved every minute of it. it's like getting an A+ on a test because you cheated - sure, the mark looks great on your report card, but deep down inside you know you didn't earn it!
if a band is going to make a "live" album, it ought to be just that - a live recording. don't go back in the studio and re-do a vocal that was off, or a missed guitar note. don't enhance the sound of the audience. a live recording should be an exact re-production of the live show. otherwise, it's like touching up the mona lisa - it may look nice but it ain't the real thing!
COMMENT | Live material posted by : MRSPEED 11/4/2009 12:20:00 PM
What I don’t like is paying for garbage just for the sake of calling it original. Motley Crue’s live album is dreadful. I’m glad KISS touched theirs up but I also feel that there is no need to hide it. As for the various Alive albums, I personally do not like Alive III. I don’t think it’s true to the original form of the Alive albums, which is to play the material since the last Alive album. Deuce, Wathcin’ You, Rock and Roll all Night and DRC did not belong on it. At least Alive IV was something different. As a KISS fan I accept my band as what they’ve become, I always say Paul and Gene had a right to carry on without Ace and Peter when they weren’t into or up to the job. That being said KISS did release Unmasked and the Elder. They also went glam and went on to release Animalize through Hot in the Shade. You can’t ignore it and to say that’s not KISS, is like saying that the band broke up and there are the 4 original members. I know some of you feel this way. It pisses me off that since ’96 they ignore songs like Heaven’s on Fire, Tears are Falling, Crazy Nights, Hide your Heat, I just Wanna and Domino live. Anyone else have an opinion on this? If genesburger replies, I just hope it’s an honest opinion and not full of meaningless crap.
COMMENT | hmmmm..... posted by : Haymaker 11/4/2009 12:47:45 PM
mr. speed, kiss has pissed me off on so many levels since the reunion tour ended that it's hard to separate my feelings!
i've always said that, for a band with such a wealth of music to play, the kiss live set is extremely limited. they pretty much draw on the music they recorded pre-1978. not only that, it's the SAME stuff pre-1978. i would love to see kiss mix it up on a nightly basis - throw in "domino", or "goin' blind", or "i just wanna" - why the hell not?
yes, we know you gotta play "rock and roll all nite" and "detroit rock city" - those are cornerstones of the live show. but in between the givens, why not mix it up?
COMMENT | posted by : JRSPON 11/4/2009 2:11:47 PM
Thats why i liked Pauls colo dvd, different songs live, Magic Touch, Hide Your Heart.
There are 30 Kiss songs i would love to hear live , But if they dont ever play them, it doesnt make me dislike them(Kiss)
COMMENT | BLIND!!!!^^^^ posted by : YerMamaSux 11/4/2009 2:27:39 PM
I think you KISS-dorks are missing the point. Why did Stanley Eisen and Chaim Witz re-do their live recording in the studio? Because their performances at live shows were sub-par! Why did they enhance the audience sounds? To make the audience sound bigger than they actually were!
KI$$ have always been master-marketers of themselves. Their stage show itself is designed to distract from the fact that they are lousy musicians. The (un)live albums are designed to create an image of a band in demand. The packaging (i.e. extra cd's, dvd's, toys, etc.) are also designed to distract from what's inside - which is sub-par rock and roll music!
COMMENT | posted by : JRSPON 11/4/2009 3:49:29 PM
Go to ticketmaster, click on the Kiss tour, read the thousands of articles from fans, they Are playing what the majority of the fans want, if you play onmly 80's stuff , they would loose the fans that made them, they play what has made them legends today - i for one would love to see a Kisstour kind of like AliveIII with a few more 80's tunes.
COMMENT | great replies... posted by : MRSPEED 11/4/2009 7:44:45 PM
I don't think there is anyway Bruce gets royalties from the 80s material. Also Peter gets royalties from Animalize - it was part of package. I think they could drop She or Watchin You for Crazy Nights and Take it Off. As far as the music during the live shows, just watch the original Alive recordings on Exposed or youtube any concert footage and they're pretty good. Far better than other acts. the Superbowl and Olympics, etc. were damn good. A concert is great when you're there but when I listen to it my trailer (lol) I don't want to listen to something that doesn't sound good. I would have loved to see Paul's solo act and I should get his DVD. Only thing is I wish he showed more cleavege! That's for my buddy genesburger (who doesn't seem like a bad guy when he thinks first).
COMMENT | people miss the point posted by : swishersweets20031 11/5/2009 7:19:20 AM
it doesnt matter if it was recorded in a studio or live. The point of the album was to make you feel like you were at a concert. It captures that. Someone allready mentioned on that kiss ruled the world special they pretty much showed how they doctored alive.. was recorded live.. but they went into the studio and layered the vocals with studio vocals and same with everything else on that album. But i do feel the drums and ace's guitar work is still more original then the rest.
COMMENT | So someone named Dominic is like wow posted by : LetmePost09101112 11/6/2009 3:36:08 PM
A friend here...
so like...gene doesnt want to be gene?
Dominic
lets say frank taylor, or raphael michallangelo or donetello quite frankly you can have a different middle name but you cant have someone's birth name as your own CAUSE ITS HIS. birth right.
DAH H is good. and however someone tries to click Tagged images is not legal. How can someone take tagged images where it makes it so you cant click them. That means (C).
BLABBERMOUTH.NET is run and operated independently of Roadrunner Records. The accuracy of the information
contained herein is neither confirmed nor guaranteed by Roadrunner Records, and the views and opinions of
authors expressed on these pages do not necessarily state or reflect those of Roadrunner Records or its employees.
